Subject:
|
Re: Printable parts catalog
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 06:58:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
864 times
|
| |
|
|
Patrick Sayre-Little <sayrew@pr.erau.edu> wrote in message news:3AD3AB0D.46312C7D@pr.erau.edu...
> And now for a question. Somebody (I forget who, sorry) mentioned that I should
> put all the new parts (when there are any) where they're supposed to go, rather
> than at the end in their own section. Or was that in addition to? So, my
> question is, What is _your_ preference? At the end, integrated, both? New parts
> as a separate file? Something else?
> --
That was me.
My preference to put all new part in their own categories sorted appropriately. I can see no advantage in putting the new parts at
the end of the catalog, because when you are looking for a part during model building, it has the least importance that this part is
new or old. And even it is disturbing to look for it in two sections.
However, to contracdict to myself, it can be nice to see what are the new parts in an update, but I suggest to reflect this only by
attaching a "new" sign or any small flag to their picture in their right place. In the next update this flags should be removed and
attached to the "new" new parts.
Thanks
Ampi
---------------------------------------
Imre Papp
Geometria GIS Systems House
email: ipapp@geometria.hu
---------------------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Printable parts catalog
|
| Just thought I'd post an update. I've decided to go ahead with the putting-numbers-on-the-images method rather than HTML tables. I think it's better in lots of ways. I've already gotten the first page done, and believe it or don't, all the bricks (...) (24 years ago, 11-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
