 | | Re: ldglite version 0.8.0 —Don Heyse
|
| | | (...) ... Whoops! That should say "LDLite 2.0 in Windows". (I've been typing that g so much that it just slipped out without me knowing about it) I think the -U option of LDLite is a terrific feature and just wanted to make at least a portion of it (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: ldglite version 0.8.0 —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) Ah, I actually thought that ldglite had different features in Windows, which I found to be a bit odd. (...) I agree that this feature is very nice in LDLITE, and I have used it a lot to compose large images. The goal of this was mainly to do (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: ldglite version 0.8.0 —Don Heyse
|
| | | | (...) What platform have you used the antialiasing on? My linux test box only has a 256 color unaccelerated video card. The performance goes from poor to unacceptable when I try to antialias on it. Meanwhile the software only opengl driver for (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: ldglite version 0.8.0 —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) It's a 400MHz Pentium II with Matrox G200 video card. At the time, I was running Linux 2.2 and X Windows 3.x. I don't think this combo did any hardware acceleration. When using anti aliasing, I didn't notice any performance drop at all. It was (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
