Subject:
|
Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sat, 9 Dec 2000 10:59:49 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
ssgore@superonline.!Spamcake!com
|
Viewed:
|
712 times
|
| |
|
|
Eric McCarthy wrote:
>
> Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> > Seriously I don't know that any sort of market survey has been taken but I
> > think MLCad has a lot of adherents. It's pretty well supported by the
> > author. Feature rich, graphical, easy to use (except for the helps which are
> > broken, unfortunately) and fast.
>
> For free software MLCad is great. I used it to create a set.
> However, in my experience the output was of horrible quality.
> Even though I used the highest resolution, it lost most of the
> horizontal lines between layers of bricks, and I spent lots of time
> in a paint program drawing lines back in. Also, I got zero (0) responses
> to my question in lugnet.cad.mlcad, which didn't improve my
> confidence in getting support.
>
> /Eric McC/
I strongly suggest you to give LeoCAD a try. I think you will be
satisfied on most issues.
Selçuk
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
| (...) For free software MLCad is great. I used it to create a set. However, in my experience the output was of horrible quality. Even though I used the highest resolution, it lost most of the horizontal lines between layers of bricks, and I spent (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
