Subject:
|
Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 7 Dec 2000 23:33:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
850 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Seriously I don't know that any sort of market survey has been taken but I
> think MLCad has a lot of adherents. It's pretty well supported by the
> author. Feature rich, graphical, easy to use (except for the helps which are
> broken, unfortunately) and fast.
For free software MLCad is great. I used it to create a set.
However, in my experience the output was of horrible quality.
Even though I used the highest resolution, it lost most of the
horizontal lines between layers of bricks, and I spent lots of time
in a paint program drawing lines back in. Also, I got zero (0) responses
to my question in lugnet.cad.mlcad, which didn't improve my
confidence in getting support.
/Eric McC/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
| (...) I don't have as much of a problem with that, but it's not as high quality as I'd like. Long term I think the ability to plug in different render engines is in plan. I do see this as a bit of a problem and would be interested in the opinions of (...) (24 years ago, 8-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
