 | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers... —Jennifer L. Boger
|
| | | (...) umm... it works fine for me? (24 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers... —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Wow, that's doubly bizarre... I wonder if it Yahoo!'s server is looking at something else, then, such as the OS type, the browser type, or various MIME declarations from the browser, etc... I'm using NN 4.x for Linux/i686... --Todd [XFUT (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers... —Jennifer L. Boger
|
| | | | | (...) win 95 and NC 4.7 (I won't let dan put linux on this machine... he can have the 486 :) ) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers... —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Heehee -- all he needs is a 486 for Linux. :) Linux on a 25 MHz. 80486 will blow the socks off a 700 MHz. Pentium III running Win95. :) (j/k) --Todd (24 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers... —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) heheh. that's almost the exact situation we have here. 486/25 running RH6.0 (6.1 won't install, didn't have time to get it to yet), compared to PIII/500 running win95... I can't say the linux is faster, at least not in X :P At work, however, (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers... —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Curious -- why won't 6.1 install? (24 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers... —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) not sure yet (only tried it today, after burning a CD at work), and the first thing I get asked after the bootloader is "please insert your driver disk". It doesn't matter which mode I choose (graphical, text, or expert), it doesn't say what (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers... —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) I think that they have in fact removed a few things from the 6.1 installl disk (it's a pretty tight squeeze), but it shouldn't have been anything remotely mainstream. In my (humble, of course) opinion, the 6.1/6.2 installer is terribly broken. (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers... —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) yah, that fits my experience with their install - you say that the 6.2 isn't any better? I havn't tried it yet... (...) nod - I ran into that trying to upgrade 6.0 to 6.1 in place, and failing misrably... ended up going a full install. (yay (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers... —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) It seems slightly better, but still ain't whatcha might call "robust". (24 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
