 | | Re: LDraw.org website theme.
|
|
(...) I've pretty much decided on Joomla 1.6. Unless I hit any major snags, that's what I've prepped for. When I get everything setup, I'll send out a call for help. -Orion (14 years ago, 23-May-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org website theme.
|
|
(...) Orion, What CMS are you going to use? I have some experience in making websites and want to help if needed. Jaco (14 years ago, 23-May-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org website theme.
|
|
(...) Hi Orion, You may find more people with those skills over on Flickr. I've copied the message to there. Tim (14 years ago, 22-May-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org website theme.
|
|
Hi all, I'm going to be working on the website over the next few weeks. I suck at graphic design, I think this is a perfect to solicit ideas/designs for the website theme. No coding experience is required. I can handle that aspect if needed. -Orion (14 years ago, 22-May-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org File Encoding Standard Ratified
|
|
(...) Wow, that was fast! Thanks, Chris. Unfortunately it doesn't solve the issue. LDraw Apache server sends the page telling that charset is iso-8859-1 (why???) and this overrides page head specification. If I save the page and open it with my (...) (14 years ago, 21-May-11, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org File Encoding Standard Ratified
|
|
(...) Parts Tracker pages now specify charset=UTF-8. Chris (14 years ago, 21-May-11, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org File Encoding Standard Ratified
|
|
(...) It would be a good thing that Parts Tracker generated html pages use utf-8 as encoding charset instead of iso-8859-1 See discussion here (URL) this message (URL) it seems that a new CMS is on its way, maybe the charset change should be done in (...) (14 years ago, 21-May-11, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Updating LDConfig - Request for New Colors
|
|
(...) Personally, I have always used color 256 (Rubber Black) for that part and it looks very good. See this picture as an example: (URL) Albrecht (14 years ago, 20-May-11, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Updating LDConfig - Request for New Colors
|
|
(...) Bricklink color 150, Medium Dark Flesh, does not have a matching color name/number from TLG or LDraw in any color chart I've seen. It may be too new; it only first appeared in sets from 2010. Their color 151, Speckle Black-Gold, also first (...) (14 years ago, 20-May-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Updating LDConfig - Request for New Colors
|
|
I was recently informed that LDConfig does not have the proper colors for this part: (URL) anyone know of any more colors that may be missing or need to be added? I have also been asked to change a few colors in LDConfig that don't look quite right. (...) (14 years ago, 20-May-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD and LDraw - which has the most parts?
|
|
(...) OK, but that rules out parts that were in before that have been removed. I recently opened an old LDD file which was complete, but is now incomplete due to lack of parts. Also correct models opened in free build mode give incorrect colors (...) (14 years ago, 20-May-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD and LDraw - which has the most parts?
|
|
An estimation made by JC Tchang gives 2433 parts for LDD and 4506 for LDraw. These figures include patterned parts, but not the 550 LDraw shortcut parts. Philo (14 years ago, 20-May-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD and LDraw - which has the most parts?
|
|
--snip-- (...) The newer versions have a free build mode with all parts available in all colours. I'd guess that LDraw has many more non-minifig parts but LDD may pip it now for total due to the proliferation of minifig parts. Tim (14 years ago, 20-May-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD and LDraw - which has the most parts?
|
|
I am glad import function for LDraw in LDD has been restored. For me it didn't work a while. Pitty not all parts are in and parts that are in LDD get removed now and then. (14 years ago, 19-May-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD and LDraw - which has the most parts?
|
|
(...) Hmm, and I am sure that LDraw has more though (correct me if I am wrong or prove otherwise). I mean, take all old parts that _are_ in LDraw and _not_ in LDD. Take the color availability in to account, and there you go. If I'd model my designs (...) (14 years ago, 19-May-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why does "dark tan" in LDConfig not look like dark tan?
|
|
(...) Thanks...I'll change them and upload them soon. Scott W. (14 years ago, 19-May-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD and LDraw - which has the most parts?
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure LDD has way more parts, patterns being a possible exception. Many LDraw parts that have been developed more recently were done so with the gracious help of the Lego Universe Team, who did us the favor of converting batches of (...) (14 years ago, 18-May-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LDD and LDraw - which has the most parts?
|
|
Hi all, I recently found this post on the Eurobricks website: (URL) you can find a huge list of Lego sets that are available in LDD format. It was interesting to note that many of the sets are missing certain pieces (mainly sticker parts and minifig (...) (14 years ago, 18-May-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why does "dark tan" in LDConfig not look like dark tan?
|
|
(...) I think dark tan is so far wrong in the official file that it's in desperate need of a correction. It looks much closer to the color Bricklink refers to as medium dark flesh, which appeared in some of the Prince of Persia sets. That has a rich (...) (14 years ago, 18-May-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why does "dark tan" in LDConfig not look like dark tan?
|
|
(...) OK, I'll keep you in mind if I find other color issues. The "rendered look" came out great!! (URL) (14 years ago, 17-May-11, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
