 | | Re: Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote: <insert scissors here> (...) <insert scissors here> (...) I myself would rather like to see something like Cross Blocks. My suggestion would be: 3651.dat - Technic Connector (Pin/Bush) with 2 Studs 32039.dat - Technic (...) (15 years ago, 4-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
|
|
(...) Maybe we can replace them after all. Look at this picture: (URL) orange poles indicate the occurances of x606p01b.dat. They are all in undeveloped areas, so I think it's possible to replace them with other roadplates. /Tore (15 years ago, 3-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | 2010/2011 LDraw.org Steering Committee: Voting and results
|
|
As only (URL) five people have accepted> nomination for a position on the 2010/2011 LDraw SteerCo and the SteerCo only has five positions I think we can dispense with voting. The new LDraw SteerCo for 2010/2011 is thus: Kevin Clague, Travis Cobbs, (...) (15 years ago, 2-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Beams vs. Liftarms (was Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation)
|
|
(...) Chris, My sincerest apologies for my remark - After double checking I realized that although I had installed the latest updates, I had not purged the unofficial files from the directories and started looking for liftarms to only find half... (...) (15 years ago, 27-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: HQ minifig head (grin pattern) with LGEO
|
|
(...) Has this problem be solved in the meantime? cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 27-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation
|
|
(...) <SNIP> (...) "Peghole" is already used in a few part descriptions in the official library, and there are even primitives named peghole* to support their representation. "Pinhole" is not used in the official library at all. Chris Dee (15 years ago, 26-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Beams vs. Liftarms (was Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation)
|
|
(...) I am surprised by this renewed criticism of the Technic Beam naming as we have worked very hard on resolving that issue over the past few releases. Is your library up-to-date? As mentioned at (URL) most of these issues were resolved in (...) (15 years ago, 26-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation
|
|
(...) I appreciate your work on this, but I wonder if there aren't other more important changes (albeit probably more difficult ones) that would be of more benefit to the community. I'm referring particularly to the present dichotomy of Beams and (...) (15 years ago, 26-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation
|
|
(...) I am mostly OK with your suggestion. The only slightly illogical point is that the bush of 3651 and the Axlehole of 32039 are not so different, so why not name them the same? Otherwise, the other drawback of these names (especially angle (...) (15 years ago, 26-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation
|
|
In (URL) Philo wrote "Speaking of rationalization, I would be very happy if we could find a coherent naming scheme for parts 3651, 32039, 6553 (and 32013?) - I can't possibly remember 6553 name...". So here is a first suggestion: Currently we have: (...) (15 years ago, 26-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
