 | | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts —Matthew J. Chiles
|
| | | (...) Amen! Preach it Brother Allen! I agree with you on all fronts. In the good news department - a part I first submitted 3 1/2 years ago (40375) finally got certified this weekend. But the pace of output for this stuff in painfully slow, and (...) (16 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts —Willy Tschager
|
| | | | | (...) Sorry Matt but this is cheap. Everyone who has the skills to author a part has all that's needed to review one. Instead of blaiming the reviewers go and ask for review rights - it might takes hours to review a part but it takes less than (...) (16 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts —Michael Heidemann
|
| | | | In lugnet.cad, Matthew J. Chiles <mattchiles@gorge.net> wrote: SNIP (...) SNIP Reviewing is not a big deal for most parts. Please see a good (but not at the current stage) tutorial here: (URL) am with you if you like to have more reviewers on the (...) (16 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts —Willy Tschager
|
| | | | (...) Mike, if you're really looking for part to take of there are loads waiting for you: (URL) (16 years ago, 14-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts —Michael Heidemann
|
| | | | (...) I would have correct that parts if I would own them. As you know as an author you need to have the part, as a reviewer you don't need to have the part. cu mikeheide (16 years ago, 23-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
