 | | Re: Opinions needed for Color and Edge Values —Willy Tschager
|
| | | (...) I'd like to hear some opinions on how we do define backwards compatibility? Considering that most user built their models using MLCad (no idea which color numbers are supported by Leo, Bricksmith or SR3D) which comes with very limited color (...) (16 years ago, 25-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Opinions needed for Color and Edge Values —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | | (...) I am _strongly_ against that. Imho this is the same mistake LEGO did a few years ago with the stone colors. What would be the point of defining a standard (ldconfig.ldr) to change it at the first drawback? Colors 70..72 are defined for more (...) (16 years ago, 25-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Opinions needed for Color and Edge Values —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | | (...) I completely agree that changing the colour codes at this stage is a terrible idea. However I have nothing against duplicating them. One thing we do need is to maintain, alongside the LDraw codes, mapping lists to other known systems such as (...) (16 years ago, 25-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Opinions needed for Color and Edge Values —Scott Wardlaw
|
| | | | (...) Since MLCAD (and other programs) do not support color codes above 511, a different approach to reading TLG colors is needed. However, I have to strongly agree with Philo. Changing color codes that have been defined for years is not a good (...) (16 years ago, 25-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
