Subject:
|
Re: Request for more stringent naming of (Complete|Shortcut) parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:16:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9352 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote:
<snip>
>
> Yes, they should, but the "mistake" was made eight years ago, before we had the
> clarity that time brings to standards implementation. The same applies to
> 754-756, at least.
>
> For backward compatibility reasons we can never remove these files from the
> parts directory, as people may have used them directly in models, and we don't
> want to break those models. The best we could do is to replace them with "~Moved
> to" files that redirect to a file in the parts/s directory. But all that does is
> add another file to the library, for little added value.
>
> This dilemma was recognised in the mass header edit that was part of the
> Contributor Agreement implementation resulting in the 2008-01 update. The
> description lines in these files are now prefixed with a tilde, indicating that
> LDraw applications should not list them in their parts list.
This is good to know. Sorry if I missed that.
>
> Chris
Kevin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
