 | | Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent —Timothy Gould
|
| | | (...) Your examples are not the same process. There's a difference between constructing something using software as a tool and constructing something using constituent visual components which can be copyrighted. That said, the actual design of the (...) (16 years ago, 21-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | | (...) Are you sure you don't mean "...not _with_ a SteerCo hat on" or perhaps "...without a SteerCo hat on"? Or is my thinking cap malfunctioning? Cheers Richie Dulin CO Legeaux (16 years ago, 22-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | | (...) The SteerCo hat was off my head as the space was occupied by the incorrect double negative hat. Tim (16 years ago, 22-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent —Daniel Siskind
|
| | | | (...) The difference is you are selling an image of a product and NOT an exact duplicate of a product. LEGO may have certain trademarks over the specific design of their bricks, their name, their branding, etc., but they can't stop anyone from (...) (16 years ago, 26-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
