To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 14314
14313  |  14315
Subject: 
Re: First SNOT spheres, now SNOT bunnies?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.cad
Date: 
Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:31:54 GMT
Viewed: 
480 times
  
In lugnet.build.sculpture, Thomas Garrison wrote:
In lugnet.announce.moc, Bram Lambrecht wrote:
<http://lego.bldesign.org/LSculpt/
<http://lego.bldesign.org/LSculpt/bunny_sides.jpg>>¬ {Click the pic for more
info}

Hmm.  Most of that went over my head.  Still, there were a few things that I
think confused me due to more than my incipient senility:

In formula 3, shouldn't that be "Let k\in \{1,2,3\} such that . . ." rather than
"Let k=\{1,2,3\} such that . . ."?

I always thought $k\in\{1,2,3\}$ was pretty much equivalent in this situation to
$k=1,2,3$. By your definition you are assigning k to be equal to the set as
opposed to a value.

And in formula 10, shouldn't it be H_i that is defined, not H?  H is the sum
itself, yes?

I think you're right about this one.

Nice bunny.

TWS Garrison

Tim



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: First SNOT spheres, now SNOT bunnies?
 
(...) Hmm. Most of that went over my head. Still, there were a few things that I think confused me due to more than my incipient senility: In formula 3, shouldn't that be "Let k\in \{1,2,3\} such that . . ." rather than "Let k=\{1,2,3\} such that . (...) (18 years ago, 18-Dec-06, to lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.cad)

22 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR