 | | Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info —Jim Foulds
|
| | | (...) Well gang, Thanks for all the input. I appreciate the views that were presented. I’ve noticed over the past few years that the cadding community has been producing some very nice tools. And now Lego has released there own (LDD). Is there a (...) (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) We (the SteerCo) are in contact with the LDD team. My personal opinion is that the two are designed for different user-bases so combatibility is more important than helping them (or they us). Tim (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info —Chris Phillips
|
| | | | (...) "Combatibility?" Was that a Freudian slip, or an intentional Yogi Berra-ism? Either way, it's pretty funny. :) (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Nice catch! :-) JOHN (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info —Jim Foulds
|
| | | | (...) Given the nature of the topic, I would say a Freudian slip ;) - Jim F. (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
