To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 14278
  Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info
 
(...) Well gang, Thanks for all the input. I appreciate the views that were presented. I’ve noticed over the past few years that the cadding community has been producing some very nice tools. And now Lego has released there own (LDD). Is there a (...) (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info
 
(...) We (the SteerCo) are in contact with the LDD team. My personal opinion is that the two are designed for different user-bases so combatibility is more important than helping them (or they us). Tim (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info
 
(...) "Combatibility?" Was that a Freudian slip, or an intentional Yogi Berra-ism? Either way, it's pretty funny. :) (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info
 
(...) Nice catch! :-) JOHN (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
 
  Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info
 
(...) Given the nature of the topic, I would say a Freudian slip ;) - Jim F. (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR