Subject:
|
Re: Old Dithered Colors
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:24:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1295 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Michael Lachmann wrote:
>
> "Travis Cobbs" <tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:J2B0n8.4IB@lugnet.com...
> > I definitely think MLCad should continue to recognize the color numbers.
> > When I
> > wrote LDView, I decided not to dither the colors, and just calculate the
> > final
> > color. I really think this is the best way to go (at least if the display
> > is
> > true color, anyway).
>
> That was what I was thinking of. I still will support the color codes as
> such, but I think that I will
> stop support for defining dithered colors.
Sorry, when I read your first message, I thought you meant MLCad would no longer
support the predefined colors 256-511. Using derived values instead of
literally dithering is just fine, I agree.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Old Dithered Colors
|
| "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@sbcglobal.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:J2B4o1.AwD@lugnet.com... (...) Great then I will follow this way! Thank you all! Michael (18 years ago, 13-Jul-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Old Dithered Colors
|
| "Travis Cobbs" <tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:J2B0n8.4IB@lugnet.com... (...) That was what I was thinking of. I still will support the color codes as such, but I think that I will stop support for defining dithered colors. (...) (18 years ago, 12-Jul-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
