To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 13334
13333  |  13335
Subject: 
Re: Question on dithered color subfiling
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:45:34 GMT
Viewed: 
1358 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Orion Pobursky wrote:
In lugnet.cad, Imre Papp wrote:
Dear List,

I need a clarification concerning a part authoring/reviewing question.

Until recently there were a rule for the part authors, that quads and triangles
having dithered colors must be subfiled. If I remember well this was due to some
limitation in the original Ldraw viewer. But some times ago this obligation has
been revoked. (This is the point where my memory does not serve me well.)

Reviewing unofficial parts I found (among the oldest residents of the Part
Tracker), some parts keeping this recently revoked rule. My question is should
the reviewer put a hold on these parts (and ask the author to re-inline the
colored subfile), or we can live with the old-style subfiling approach.

It would be good if the Standard Committee could present some guidelines in this
topic.

While this is no longer a requirement, I feel that parts conforming to the old
standard are not wrong and a hold vote based solely on this would probably be
excessive.  I would, however, make note of it in the review comments.

-Orion


looks like we have to do more chit chat how this advise shall be applied. please
read my consideration at ldraw's PT:

http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/s/3629pw2a.dat

to avoid further confusion I'm in favor to work out a general note which could
be used by the reviewers to tag old parts with subfiled dithered colors.

bye, w.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Question on dithered color subfiling
 
(...) While this is no longer a requirement, I feel that parts conforming to the old standard are not wrong and a hold vote based solely on this would probably be excessive. I would, however, make note of it in the review comments. -Orion (19 years ago, 9-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad)

5 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR