Subject:
|
Re: Question on dithered color subfiling
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:36:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
967 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.cad, Orion Pobursky wrote:
>
> While this is no longer a requirement, I feel that parts conforming to the old
> standard are not wrong and a hold vote based solely on this would probably be
> excessive. I would, however, make note of it in the review comments.
>
> -Orion
Thanks, that was my default assumption. I only needed a confirmation from the
LSC.
Ampi
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Question on dithered color subfiling
|
| (...) While this is no longer a requirement, I feel that parts conforming to the old standard are not wrong and a hold vote based solely on this would probably be excessive. I would, however, make note of it in the review comments. -Orion (19 years ago, 9-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
5 Messages in This Thread: ![Question on dithered color subfiling -Imre Papp (9-Sep-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Question on dithered color subfiling -Orion Pobursky (9-Sep-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Question on dithered color subfiling -Jan Folkersma (9-Sep-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Question on dithered color subfiling -Willy Tschager (11-Sep-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|