 | | Re: Certifying sub-parts (was: LDraw.org 2004-03) —Ross Crawford
| | | | (...) Yeah, I'm more worried about how much more difficult it becomes to certify, because reviewers need to modify all the references manually, and if they don't know to do that, they think it's broken and put a hold on it (like steffen). Is there (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Certifying sub-parts (was: LDraw.org 2004-03) —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) We could, but I'd rather not; this is an exceptional case. In general circumstances, we'd consider x170c01.dat to be broken. It'd be nice if there was an easier way to tell the tracker about groups of files that need to be released together. (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Certifying sub-parts (was: LDraw.org 2004-03) —Ross Crawford
| | | | | (...) Maybe comments could be left by the submitter somewhere to prompt you when preparing an update? Still relies on it being seen, I guess. (...) Yes, I see. I could re-submit them as x170 and x171, but I don't know if the system would let me? And (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | |
