 | | Lightbricks (x265/x266/x267)
|
|
I got some review comments about these parts on the PT: (URL) been given these partnames, without s\ suggestions by Steve Bliss, so I assumed it was right to create these as individual parts. I had a similar discussion about part 7930 and the glass (...) (21 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Lightbricks (x265/x266/x267)
|
|
(...) I'm assuming you'd like a response to Steffen's review-comments. Yes, these files should go in the parts directory, not parts\s. If for no other reason than because some model-builders might want to change colors (to non-lego-produced (...) (21 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Lightbricks (x265/x266/x267)
|
|
(...) I protested then, and I protest the same way now. I don't agree with Steve, and I probably never will. There was *ABSOLUTELY NO NEED* to make three files for one part like 7930. With some classic windows, there will even be four files: one (...) (21 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Lightbricks (x265/x266/x267)
|
|
(...) Yes! Yes! Bring in the clone brands, too! They're also non-lego-produced. /Tore (21 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Lightbricks (x265/x266/x267)
|
|
(...) "Absolutely" is an exaggeration. There's a very simple need to put the frame and the glass in separate files: so modelers can change the colors of both. Then there's a simple reason to make a combined file: because, as you said, that's the (...) (21 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Lightbricks (x265/x266/x267)
|
|
(...) Like a Gospel preacher once said: "I've shed barrels of tears because of my exaggerations"... :) /Tore (21 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
