 | | Re: Shuttle
|
|
(...) Looks nice! (...) -3.33067e-015 is *very* close to zero, and should actually be replaced with 0. I think the most recent version of MLCAD solved this problem? --Bram (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MLCad wishlist
|
|
(...) maybe I'm confusing myself. at different times I have different needs. During model design it is handy to have many subfiles as you can segment your work. When I am all done with a model, I'd like to take the MPD and create a model file from (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Timmy?
|
|
(...) I was afraid of this; I've made myself seem like a troll! Actually, I thought it would be fun to generate a Timmy fig, if only to pose it in a bunch of harrowing situations... Dave! (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Old Parts replaced by Newer Versions?
|
|
(...) I'd say functionally-different variants are pretty important. Jamie's example of the "Plate 1 x 1 with Clip Light" is one example of an important variation. An example that has been discussed at length on L-CAD and lugnet.cad.dev at length. (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MLCad wishlist (was Re: Ice Cream
|
|
(...) Right now (MLCAD 1.5), you can right-click a view, and change *that window* to one of the standard views. But you can't add new view-definitions, like "upside down" or "right-front-below" (aka, pit-crew view angle). LDAO allows these types of (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: swept wings
|
|
(...) Cool! But things like this should go into .cad.dat.ideas. :) Jeff (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
|
(...) Aha! I don't remember that pain, but that sounds about right! That would certainly explain why that double-tube plate made parts connected to it so difficult to pull apart! :-( --Todd [followups to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands] (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
|
(...) I believe that would take care of the problem. CSTUD.DAT wouldn't be recognized by LDraw and LEdit as anything special--these two programs recognize files named stud*.dat as special files; LDraw substitutes stu2*.dat when the fast draw option (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
|
(...) I'd say, brickwise, Tyco's biggest problem is they didn't round off the edges of the bricks. You thought it hurt to step on *LEGO* bricks? Those Tyco pieces were doubly painful. Also, the lack of rounding made it hard to pry the pieces apart. (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
|
(...) It's funny you should mention that; I had the same thought once I'd downloaded the latest version of L3P and started messing around with the quality settings. If I were to use a CSTUD.DAT file, what would have to be different about it for L3P (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
