To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / *46047 (-20)
  Re: Belville Basket & Bucket Handle
 
(...) the part is not cleansed but at the moment , for me, is perfect to see the dimensions! thank you again! Cristian (15 years ago, 10-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: SR 3D Builder 0.4.5.8
 
(...) I think you just catched a really wrong version of that part. The file that is currently on the PT is fine like I already wrote above. The last change to this file has been on 07.03.2010 so the mentioned error is now gone. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 10-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Belville Basket & Bucket Handle
 
(...) It seams to be in the third batch of "official" Lego LDraw parts at: (URL) as 71861. Though I would suggest making use of cylinder and torus primitives. (15 years ago, 10-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: SR 3D Builder 0.4.5.8
 
(...) The error is on the last comment line starting with 0. It's line 13 Note that it is on the unofficial file. Byes Sergio (15 years ago, 9-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Belville Basket & Bucket Handle
 
(...) Try this (URL) (15 years ago, 9-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Belville Basket & Bucket Handle
 
Hello, I need to know if someone have modelled this part: (URL) you Cristian (15 years ago, 9-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: SR 3D Builder 0.4.5.8
 
(...) I just downloaded 32016.dat from the PT. I only found that this file is not terminated by CRLF like it should but all other lines seems to be ok. Can you please give the linenumber that has this fault? cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 9-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
 
  SR 3D Builder 0.4.5.8 released
 
Hi again, as promised, it is available the latest release of my application It is available as usual for free from its official web site (URL) miss to read the history for a summary of enhancements and changes Sergio (15 years ago, 9-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)  
 
  Re: number notation in official parts
 
(...) Such notation is not noted in any specs.. neither allowed or forbidden. At least, I can't find such. Maybe we should bring this up at LSC at some point? (FWIW I sent this in yesterday but it seems the server ate the message.. resending it) (...) (15 years ago, 9-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  SR 3D Builder 0.4.5.8
 
Hi, for anyone interested in, a new video announcing the new features of the imminent release has been uploaded on youtube at the follwing address: (URL) new release will be available soon. One note about unofficial part library before leaving: part (...) (15 years ago, 9-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: number notation in official parts
 
(...) Such notation is not noted in any specs.. neither allowed or forbidden. At least, I can't find such. Maybe we should bring this up at LSC at some point? -Santeri (15 years ago, 9-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  number notation in official parts
 
If I rotate a part in LDDP the result may look like this: 1 16 4E-15 4 -20 0 0 1 0 -1 0 -1 0 0 stud4.dat This can be read by LDView and MLCad as a valid number. Is such notation allowed in official parts? It is nowhere explicit allowed or (...) (15 years ago, 8-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation
 
(...) It makes sense, and has the benefit of homogeneous naming with cross blocks. Philo (15 years ago, 4-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation
 
In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote: <insert scissors here> (...) <insert scissors here> (...) I myself would rather like to see something like Cross Blocks. My suggestion would be: 3651.dat - Technic Connector (Pin/Bush) with 2 Studs 32039.dat - Technic (...) (15 years ago, 4-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
 
(...) Maybe we can replace them after all. Look at this picture: (URL) orange poles indicate the occurances of x606p01b.dat. They are all in undeveloped areas, so I think it's possible to replace them with other roadplates. /Tore (15 years ago, 3-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: 2010/2011 LDraw.org Steering Committee: Voting and results
 
(...) Yes, you are right! cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 3-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
 
  Re: 2010/2011 LDraw.org Steering Committee: Voting and results
 
(...) Actually, that says that the election must happen by 01 March, and new Steering Committee members become active 30 days later. So I guess 31 March is the official start date. --Travis (15 years ago, 2-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
 
  Re: 2010/2011 LDraw.org Steering Committee: Voting and results
 
(...) According to (URL) we start on 01.03.2010 IMHO. Congratulations to all of you. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 2-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
 
  Re: 2010/2011 LDraw.org Steering Committee: Voting and results
 
(...) Thanks. When is the official start date? --Travis Cobbs (15 years ago, 2-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
 
  Re: example texture files
 
(...) LDVLib doesn't allow you to edit models at all. You point it at an existing file and tell it to load. Having said that, if you wanted to do some (most?) of the work, it could probably be made to be usable for a minifig modeler, since (...) (15 years ago, 2-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR