 | | number notation in official parts
|
|
If I rotate a part in LDDP the result may look like this: 1 16 4E-15 4 -20 0 0 1 0 -1 0 -1 0 0 stud4.dat This can be read by LDView and MLCad as a valid number. Is such notation allowed in official parts? It is nowhere explicit allowed or (...) (15 years ago, 8-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation
|
|
(...) It makes sense, and has the benefit of homogeneous naming with cross blocks. Philo (15 years ago, 4-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote: <insert scissors here> (...) <insert scissors here> (...) I myself would rather like to see something like Cross Blocks. My suggestion would be: 3651.dat - Technic Connector (Pin/Bush) with 2 Studs 32039.dat - Technic (...) (15 years ago, 4-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
|
|
(...) Maybe we can replace them after all. Look at this picture: (URL) orange poles indicate the occurances of x606p01b.dat. They are all in undeveloped areas, so I think it's possible to replace them with other roadplates. /Tore (15 years ago, 3-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 2010/2011 LDraw.org Steering Committee: Voting and results
|
|
(...) Yes, you are right! cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 3-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
