 | | Comments on some unofficial Train parts
|
|
Hello everyone, glad to see the traffic on Parts Tracker! As a railway fan I am double-glad to see some Train-specific parts developing. However, I have noticed some issues with part naming so I think it's better to solve them while the parts are (...) (15 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: SR 3D Builder user manual
|
|
(...) The keyboard is usually much faster than the mouse, and I have all the commands memorized already (as do most people who use MLCAD, because it uses the same commands). -Mike (15 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: bendable track
|
|
(...) Hi Willy, Thanks for the explanation. I've never touched the STRING_BAND synthesis, so we'll have to let Don speak to this. Kevin (15 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: bendable track [DAT]
|
|
(...) Upps! Looks like there is a gap in communication. Don started writing code which would allow using "bendable" and "band" constraints together. A first result can be seen in STRING_HOSE + STRING_BAND at: (URL) SYNTH BEGIN STRING_BAND 19 0 SYNTH (...) (15 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: bendable track
|
|
(...) Hi Willy, "Spouse" bendables with treads? I'm not even married! LOL! I do not recognize the topic you are asking about. Kevin (15 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: SR 3D Builder user manual
|
|
(...) Hi, I don't ever try lEdit so I think it doesn't. Anyway you should not need keyboard to position parts, and my program is totally different! Sergio (15 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: SR 3D Builder user manual
|
|
(...) I will have to try it soon. Question: does the program support LEdit's keyboard commands? -Mike (15 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
|
|
(...) Mike, if you're really looking for part to take of there are loads waiting for you: (URL) (15 years ago, 14-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: bendable track
|
|
(...) Hi Kevin, correct. It's easier to work this out in our mothertongue. If there are problems we get back to you. Just wondering: Is there progress in "spouse" bendables with treads? w. (15 years ago, 14-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: bendable track
|
|
(...) Hi Willy, Could you please translate this for me? I suspect that you are saying, yes, we can resolve this by personal email? Thanks, Kevin (15 years ago, 14-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
