To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / *43750 (-20)
  Re: LDraw.org's position on the copyright of rendered images
 
(...) Thank you Willy and the SteerCo for answering the question with this clear and eminently reasonable response. For reference, here is my original question: (URL) (16 years ago, 18-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  SR 3D Builder 0.3.2.1 Released
 
New version of my CAD application has just been released as always you can find it at (URL) building Sergio (16 years ago, 18-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LDraw.org 2008-01 Parts Library Update now available
 
(...) The suggestion that fixes to already released official parts should not be in the unofficial library download ((URL)) seems reasonable at first reading, but we need to consider the wider implications. For example, consider the following (...) (16 years ago, 18-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LDraw.org 2008-01 Parts Library Update now available
 
(...) And they may come back on Tracker as a new version when an author improves an already certified part. So often you have to deal with two version of the same part, one official and one (improved) on PT. Philo (16 years ago, 18-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LDraw.org 2008-01 Parts Library Update now available
 
(...) That has always happened in the past, and will presumably happen with the next update. The parts tracker "unofficial parts library" only contains new (unreleased) files and that have been modified since the last update. This update was (...) (16 years ago, 18-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LDraw.org 2008-01 Parts Library Update now available
 
Hi, I'm the author of SR 3D Builder and I was thinking that the update were including part corrections and fixes at least for the official parts, but I understand that is a huge work. Since my appl loads the whole part library to build images for (...) (16 years ago, 18-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Request for more stringent naming of (Complete|Shortcut) parts
 
(...) NOT that it's probably relevant to the discussion one way or the other, but... :-) Back before TLG was into their current practice of saving on packaging*, the boxes had what I always referred to as the "Display tray", a plastic molded tray (...) (16 years ago, 18-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Request for more stringent naming of (Complete|Shortcut) parts
 
(...) Sorry. I misinterpreted your initial post. I just went back and reread it, and see that it doesn't actually say that the user used 4107488.dat, but it does seems to imply this (at least to me). (...) I had forgotten about that new format for (...) (16 years ago, 18-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Request for more stringent naming of (Complete|Shortcut) parts
 
(...) The point is that the model does *not* use 4107488.dat because that is not the right shape for the model...... If everyone only ever used 4107488.dat, I would not have brought it up. (...) Chris has told me how to recognize the complete parts. (...) (16 years ago, 18-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Request for more stringent naming of (Complete|Shortcut) parts
 
In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote: <snip> (...) This is good to know. Sorry if I missed that. (...) Kevin (16 years ago, 18-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LDraw.org 2008-01 Parts Library Update now available
 
(...) purely a header standardisation exercise, although minor changes were made to part descriptions as part of this. Chris (16 years ago, 18-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Request for more stringent naming of (Complete|Shortcut) parts
 
(...) Well, it's not shipped completely disassembled (arms and hands are pre-attached to the torso, and legs are attached to hips). However, I have certainly never seen them shipped completely assembled as a minifig (except for the glued keychains, (...) (16 years ago, 18-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Request for more stringent naming of (Complete|Shortcut) parts
 
(...) Whether the Header Specification is ambiguous or not, this is how I believe I have implemented the "Shortcut" filetype in the !LDRAW_ORG line. So for the 2008-01 official library onwards, grep '!LDRAW_ORG Shortcut' * > foo should be reliable. (...) (16 years ago, 18-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LDraw Design Pad v2.0 Beta 4
 
(...) Since there is question about how LDDP should mirror, what is the expected behavior? If my method is unexpected then how should the process be changed? (...) Can you give me more specifics? I added this since the last beta so it might not work (...) (16 years ago, 18-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Request for more stringent naming of (Complete|Shortcut) parts
 
(...) <SNIP> (...) Yes, they should, but the "mistake" was made eight years ago, before we had the clarity that time brings to standards implementation. The same applies to 754-756, at least. For backward compatibility reasons we can never remove (...) (16 years ago, 18-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Request for more stringent naming of (Complete|Shortcut) parts
 
(...) I guess they should be, but they are not. (...) Fair enough. I didn't know they were always shipped disassembled. (...) The only files that LPub opens and analyzes are model and submodel files. All other opening and analyzing of part files is (...) (16 years ago, 17-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Request for more stringent naming of (Complete|Shortcut) parts
 
(...) Shouldn't 680.dat, 681.dat, and 682.dat all be in the parts/s directory? They don't represent real pieces of plastic (or rubber in this case), so I don't understand why they are modeled as such. Or do synthesized sub-parts get treated (...) (16 years ago, 17-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LDraw Design Pad v2.0 Beta 4
 
(...) A welcome addition to LDDP! Now I find Mirror/Rotations a bit misleading: - Mirroring of type 1 lines is done centered on subfile origin - Mirroring of other line types and rotation of all element types is done centered on main file origin. (...) (16 years ago, 17-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LDraw.org 2008-01 Parts Library Update now available
 
(...) You are right, the file is truncated. But this mistake is not recent, it already appeared in LDraw.org Parts Update 2003-02 ((URL) A corrected version is now on PT ((URL) (...) This is not a problem, "The whitespace characters allowed for (...) (16 years ago, 17-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LDraw.org 2008-01 Parts Library Update now available
 
Attention please: Part 32172.dat has incomplete last line. Fix it Also part 4220.dat has TAB char separator instead of spaces... Thanks Sergio (16 years ago, 15-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR