 | | Re: Bricksmith tips and techniques
|
|
Jim DeVona wrote: [...] Bricksmith doesn't display coordinate axes. However, (...) [...]> (...) Hey, That's cool. I still am using the same old computer, so LDGLite is the LDRAWing tool of choice for me, but never the less, that is a cool trick. (...) (18 years ago, 21-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Accountability of "Key Positions" - updated version
|
|
(...) to get pedantic (likewise not via SteerCo) I think this may be better (change is in bold or square brackets) Section 6.09: Removal of Key Positions Key Positions are accountable to the Steering Committee and might be removed if someone fails (...) (18 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Accountability of "Key Positions" - updated version
|
|
Many thx for your input! Find below a revised version of the motion. Please note this has not gone through the SteerCo and is proposed solely by me in an attempt to move on from this issue as quickly as possible. w. ---...--- Beginning of motion (...) (18 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
(...) I took a look at the QChar docs in both QT 3 and QT 4, and updated the failing line of code to call the unicode() function on the QChar object. This builds fine in QT 3, and should also build fine in QT 4. I haven't had a chance yet to see if (...) (18 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
(...) On my MacBook, wchart is a 4-byte type. I'm not sure about the QChar definition. I've found a class definition in /src/corelib/tools/q...ar.h/.cpp, but my C++ is weak so on first glance I'm not sure how to interpret its type compatibility. (...) (18 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView Ortho View?
|
|
(...) Ah, good to know. Thanks Travis, I'll give it a shot. (18 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView Ortho View?
|
|
If you set the viewing angle in LDView to 0.1, you'll get something that very closely approximates a true Ortho View. True Ortho is on the list of future features, but I just haven't gotten around to implementing it. --Travis (18 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LDView Ortho View?
|
|
Just wanted to drop a request for an orthogonal view in an LDView future release. Unless I'm missing something, it appears all of its views are perspective, which isn't ideal for instruction creation. I like the LDView render better than LDGLite, (...) (18 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
(...) I have to wonder what QChar is defined as in QT4. In QT3, it's just an integer type, as far as I can tell. The wchar_t type is just an integer type (4-byte integer in Linux, 2-byte integer in Windows, not sure about OSX). I suspect this error (...) (18 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Accountability of "Key Positions": Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
While it's implied in the current text, I think you should make it expicit that "firing" someone requires 3 of the 5 SteerCo members to vote in favor of "firing" that person. --Travis (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
(...) It turns out I was wrong about the above. The back-ported QT 3.3 that Peter tracked down was the Windows version. The QT 3.3.7 that I'm using for Mac OSX is the official free version from Trolltech. (Peter compiled the QT version of LDView (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Accountability of "Key Positions": Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
(...) Hi Willy, I agree with these additions. Just some minor changes: 6.08: "about appointments of new ones" -> "about new appointments" 6.10: "otherwise unable to fulfill" -> "otherwise unable to fulfill his or her duties" (repetetive but I think (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
(...) Wow! That's great news. Indeed, I wasn't aware that an up-to-date Mac version was in the works. (...) Making it universal with no dependencies is great - that will make it easily accessible to a lot more people than if prerequisites like Boost (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Chain renders incorrect using LPub
|
|
(...) Jaco, This looks like a problem with the renderer, not LPub specifically. Does it look correct in MLCad? Does it look correct when rendered by the renderer without using LPUb? It looks to me like the LDraw part that represents the minifig (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
It looks similar to Jim's (with a different model), but here's a screenshot: (URL) It appears that we compiled with different versions of QT; Jim's border around the graphics area is different, as is the toolbar area. I didn't mention it in my (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
Thanks for doing that, Jim. Just as a note, the latest development code compiles and runs on Mac OS X without modification, and LDView 3.2 will have an official Mac Universal Binary version (although it might labeled as Beta). (Getting the Universal (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
Hi, everyone. I'm extremely pleased to announce that I've managed to compile (URL) LDView 3.1> on Mac OS X! Previously, I believe only (URL) version 1.0> was publicly available. Allow me to submit this piping-hot screenshot as evidence for your (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dev.mac, lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LSynth NXT cable segment
|
|
(...) The simplest answer is to stretch a cylinder to approximate the shape of the NXT cable. Kevin (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LSynth NXT cable segment
|
|
I could have sworn there was an NXT cable segment for LDraw available somewhere but for the life of me I can't find it now. Was I dreaming? (18 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Accountability of "Key Positions": Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
Willy Tschager schrieb: (...) snip (...) snip (...) I agree overall to your thoughts. This is a good step for the future. We should bring this point in a fast way to go. Michael Heidemann (18 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
