 | | Re: LPub missing pages in the layout
|
|
(...) It was missing trailing STEPs that was the problem. I'll see if I can recreate it tonight. (19 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub missing pages in the layout
|
|
(...) Dean, I tried to recreate this, by adding trailing steps to all my models/submodels in pedmatic, and it didn't cause any problems. If you can recreate this it would be a great help to me. Kevin (19 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub problems
|
|
--SNIP-- Thanks for all that. I noticed something else but need to test it more (and probably look through .cad in depth again) but when I use 0 LPUB PAGE PLI NO at the start of my file, no layout images get generated at all. I may be misusing it or (...) (19 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub problems
|
|
(...) This has been changed to ../Images for nonlayout web pages and ../Layout for pages generated through the layout process. (...) This has been fixed to SEPARATOR. (...) This has been fixed. (...) I've got to chase down the "trailing step messes (...) (19 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub bug: Page Number Font
|
|
(...) This bug has been fixed and will be available in the next release. Kevin (19 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub building instruction progress
|
|
(...) Are you drawing in the same *direction*? LineTo(x,y) draws a line upto >>but not including<< <x,y>. This is a thing of the Windows API that's always been there (since Win 1.0). The same goes for rectangles, I think. (I think the LPub results (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jun-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub building instruction progress
|
|
(...) Very cool, Jaco! (...) I'm not quite sure why Borland's graphics routine does this. I use the exact same points to draw the triangles and the lines. (...) Yes, this is a bug, and it is in the area that I has just been heavily rewritten. If you (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jun-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LPub building instruction progress
|
|
Kevin (and others interested), Take a look at this: (URL) you can imagine by now, I am quite happy about this result :-) Though I have two points I like to do better: 1. There is a "halo" effect arount one of the pointers of the callout in step 8 2. (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jun-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Callout a single part
|
|
(...) You are so right! How can I be so ignorant? (...) Thanks so much again! Jaco (without a "k" :-) (19 years ago, 16-Jun-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Callout a single part
|
|
(...) Jacko, I originally developed mine in MPD file, but presented it as non-mpd file. The file you presented above is not in valid MPD file format. The first line needs to be: 0 FILE single-callout.ldr The file with this minor correction works (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jun-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
