 | | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) For example: (URL) (just the one I picked off the top of my head) Those people that are getting mail but ignoring Orion... why? This is important. The impact to the entire community will be somewhat negative, we may have to run with two (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) For all the asterisked people, yes. This is how I found the bulk majority of the people whose email was unknown. Also, some of the people on the list are still posting here on Lugnet but for whatever reason have not contacted me. This is why I (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) Just wondering if you've tried a Google search using their name (e.g. "Jeff Findley") to see if you can find a new email address. Thanks, Jeff (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts editing made easy (well, easier)
|
|
Hi Stefan I don't know anything about neither optional lines or the programs you're converting from, but from a parts reviewers perspective, I'd say that the teapot.ldr looks pretty good. I wouldn't worry so much about automatic subpart generation. (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Parts editing made easy (well, easier)
|
|
(I posted this to lugnet.cad toplevel, but considering the total lack of response, I decided to try it down here in .dev instead, where I got all that nice feedback for my last post.) After a couple of days of coding fun, I finally have the ASE to (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
