 | | Re: Rendering problems
|
|
(...) David, that I am aware of there is no way you can just render the wireframes of your model using POV-Ray. Has anyone attempted this? (...) Read and follow this article for more info on radiosity. (URL) In a nutsheel radiosity is a function in (...) (20 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mac Brick CAD and the Imerial Star Destroyer
|
|
(...) Thanks for the MBC update! PowerBook G4, 400MHz, 512MB RAM, IBM TravelStar 40GN 40GB HD (4200 RPM), OS X 10.3.3 (build 7F44), 8MB Rage128. I don't have the .mpd extension mapped to MBC, so I dropped the Star Destroyer MPD on the MBC app. Timed (...) (20 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Rendering problems
|
|
I got 2 problems 1.how can I just render the wireframes? 2.what is radiosity and how to use it? -David Chiu (20 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Mac Brick CAD and the Imerial Star Destroyer
|
|
Following the comments by James with Orion Pobursky's version of 10030 (Imperial Star Destroyer), I took a look at the file. In it's original form there was 3 problems: 1. MBC is case sensitive when referencing sub-models (don't know if this is good (...) (20 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW ANIMATION
|
|
Thank you so much. Jason (20 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
(...) I said idealised, not standard. (...) I am sure they did. But they didn't make things that had figure eight cross sections much of the way up, if I am not much mistaken. (...) It is more than that, it is a quarter of a *cylinder*, a geometric (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help with Lsynth [DAT]
|
|
(...) Hi Jeroen, LSynth does not recognize L520.DAT and L521.DAT as constraints. I was able to synthesize a hose like this: 0 Untitled 0 Name: lsynth2.ldr 0 Author: jeroen de haan ( info@digitalbricks.nl ) 0 Unofficial Model 0 SYNTH BEGIN (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | RE: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
(...) parts (...) actual (...) According to my dictionary a dome is any curved or vaulted roof. It does not have to be circular, or even regular. The fact that something doesn't exist in reality is hardly a reason to reject a name for what is a toy. (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
(...) I would argue that two parts back to back make something that is not an actual dome, but rather some shape never seen in reality. (...) I would disagree, it is in fact highly relevant. If I take an idealised onion dome and divide it in half, I (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | RE: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
I would have to disgree. The part is half a dome - it takes two parts to make a complete dome, therefore one part is only half of the dome. The fact that the resulting shape is not half of a circle is largely irrelevant IMHO. Even if you remove the (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
