 | | Re: Vintage lightbrick 2 x 4
|
|
(...) It's easy. If the part comes (came) in only one color, you may add: 0 CMDLINE -c47 for clear. It's from the original LDraw. If you run this line: ldraw.exe 3001.dat -c47 , you get a clear 2x4 brick. And so on... /Tore (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin L. Clague wrote: [much snippage] (...) The above example parallel directory structure is just an example. I see that there are many possible alternate solutions... POV directory as sigbling of LDRAW subdirectory, where the (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
(...) One thing the project clearly needs right now is a small homepage to tell what it's all about, and outline what people can do to help. That might help pull in more active participants than a lone CVS archive. I've seen your pages, Larry. I bet (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <much snippage> (...) As Orion described, we'd rather put the ability of using POV or whatever other renderer you choose outside the LDraw file format, and outside the LDraw format parts library. If we (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW TO LUGNET
|
|
(...) time. Thanks for those nice animations of some of my moc's too! All I say to you is keep going with your animations because it's so refreshing compared to 'just' pictures. Nathanael (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: NATHANAELS 4099 TRANSFORMER
|
|
(...) Thanks both Steve for his great animation and you too Jaco! So you haven't seen this moc before Jaco? It was also there at LEGOworld. Maybe you'll see it nexttime. Den Helder perhaps? Nathanael (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Vintage lightbrick 2 x 4
|
|
I never thought this vintage part would be reviewed so quickly :-) Two more comments: (...) Whoops, my fault (shamed I did not notice that....) (...) I don't know about this statement, can somebody explain this for me? As I noticed on the pictures (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
(...) The relatively easy solution on how to make the wrench tool and, even more obvious, the (unofficial) patterned maxifig heads - that solution has become undone. (...) The only thing that ever has frustrated me about LGEO is that I never ever (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: A&M LWorks Presents a Jamie Neufeld Creation: Slave-1 POD
|
|
Here is a preview of what the next Star Wars POD will be: after moderation: (URL) direct link (URL) (hint: TIE Fighter) (hint 2: TIE Avenger (not in image) also will be released soon) -AHui A&M LWorks (2 URLs) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.inst, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
(...) What's entailed? Do you want participants who can test but not do much else? (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
(...) Actually, the only Official Library parts that have embedded P-R SDL are some of Paul Easter torus primitives. Since nothing was ever done in the first place, nothing is being undone now. If you're like me and frustrated that LGEO is (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
(...) Only until 3rd party libraries (like LGEO) become available. ROSCO (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
(...) Too sad. If I got that complicated language correcly, this means that the problem presented at (URL) and was solved by embedded POV-code has now regressed to be un-solved again. /Tore (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | A&M LWorks Presents a Jamie Neufeld Creation: Slave-1 POD
|
|
(2 URLs) More images can be found here (after moderation): (URL) You can download the BIs from here: (URL) -AHui A&M LWorks (URL) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.inst, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
(...) Yes, and if you want to join the project team let me know (this goes for anyone else as well). (...) -Orion (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
(...) OK, but whether or not the P-R SDL code was out of whack would not affect the usability of parts as parts within LDraw format programs themselves, right? (0)Only affect the accuracy or completeness or error state of transformation (by tools (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
(...) Yay! The right place for POV code is in external libraries. Does this mean (URL) is going to be developed? Is a new L3P release in the works? It's been over a year and a half since this tantalizing message was posted. :^) (URL) Don (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
(...) Basically, The POV team controls the syntax, functionality, and implementation of the POV-Ray Scene Description Language (P-R SDL) format. While the POV Team is very good at maintaining backwards compatibility, they have in the past change the (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
(...) Could you give a bit more info on the compatability issues (or a pointer to where they're discussed)? (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
The LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) has recently discussed the issue of embedded POV-Ray code in Official Parts Library files. After careful consideration and with inputs from leading non-LSC members, most notably Lars Hassing and Chris Dee, we (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
