 | | Who maintains the lugnet.cad section?
|
|
I know that Jake M. maintains the lugnet.inst section but I am wondering you maintains the lugnet.cad section? I'll like to talk to that person(s) about some suggestions for our lugnet.cad section. Thanks, AHui A&M LWorks (URL) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
|
(...) Yup! Soon! Not _exactly_ the way we brainstormed about it, but effectively the same result, I think. I don't think we'll go back automatically and retroactively convert news-posting accounts, for example. I think there'll be a transition (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | The dead Parts Tracker (was: Problem with account)
|
|
Do you guys have an estimate on when this will be working again? Is this an issue of technical difficulties, or are we waiting for someone to get back from vacation? And yes, I know this is all volunteer work. I greatly appreciate having this great (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New part: Train Track Tappered Power Rail Straight [DAT]
|
|
Any suggestions on a better title, just let me know. This part uses the box3u2p primitive (don't think that primitive is certified yet). The metal parts are missing, I haven't started on that, yet. 0 Train Track Tappered Power Rail Straight 0 Name: (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Non proportional BOM in LPub
|
|
(...) Increase the min camera distance for part images to change their scale to better match the construction image. Kevin (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I would be one of those who would be prevented from voting (at least this year), and I don't have a strong objection to not being able to vote. The restriction is designed to make the LSC a technical group voted on by technically involved (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I personally feel the restriction is a good idea. However, playing devil's advocate, I feel obliged to point out that since it would increase my voting power (since I am eligible as a software author), it's in my best interests to be in favor (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: motm/sotm
|
|
(...) I agree somewhat, but I think it's better than having no contest in the mean time. -Tim (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New SubPart - s/6309s01.dat : Duplo Tile 2 x 2 without Top Surface [DAT]
|
|
Without the parts tracker we are starting to get duplication of effort. For Thomas Garrison primarily, here is the subpart for the 2x2 Duplo Tile part, which I have been waiting to submit for some weeks. Chris 0 Duplo Tile 2 x 2 without Top Surface (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Non proportional BOM in LPub
|
|
When I generate Layouts this comes out: (URL) scale and proportions are out of bound here. I would expect the BOM to be smaller that the actual building step? Jaco "Jaco van der Molen" <jmolen@zonnet.nl> schreef in bericht (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
