 | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) Yep. Steve and I have talked before about a voting mechanism. Basically, anyone who signed up to vote can vote. This mechanism hasn't been set up yet, but it can be discussed and set up in the relative near future - according to the proposal, (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) Everyone who is interested in LDraw related stuff is part of the community. The LDraw community has some official organizations like LDraw.org and soon to be the LSC. It is my understanding that anyone who wants to vote for the nominees (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) Me either. Snipped the next bit because it's a good summation of the roles... (...) And thanks muchly for that! progress on overall org goals had stagnated. a good sharp poke was a good thing. <more snippage> (...) What I think Tim meant here (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) hmm ... probably it's due to a non-proper knowledge of the english language but now I'm even more confused! as far as I understand we have Ldraw members, which are not part of the community, community members which are not Ldraw members, (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) [snip everything else, good stuff] I think I wasn't clear enough. As you read it, I don't agree either. I meant - this proposal is yet another catalyst to the issue of further organizing and defining LDraw.org. It isn't the LSC's job, but the (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) I don't think that what Kyle is describing is what I have in mind. LDraw.org is the natural group to designate that their will be an LSC committee. The committee is made up of "technically qualified" members. Only members of LDraw.org that are (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) formats. (...) ... (...) I interpret the "set in stone" statement to refer to the language as defined in 027 version of LDraw/LEdit. It is my belief that all the nuances (nucances :^) you mentioned should be described in the 0.27 document. The (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Quiz
|
|
Hejo, I had an idea of a quiz of some sort... Version 1.0 is now on Brickshelf: (URL) have fun! Jan. (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney writes: hi tim, (...) could you please sort this out in more detail? does it mean that the "Ldraw.org" file format will support, say 256 colors, no longer required to put dithered colors in subfiles, "set in (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Translating MLCad to Dutch
|
|
Great. I have two files in english help with some words fixed (shortcuts and toolbar's names, i didn't touch editbar and elemetbar). Should I post them somewhere or just to keep_it_as_it_is?. rob (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) I think this looks very comprehensive - and I think the idea of choosing a small group of dedicated people to actually take the proposal forward is the way to go. I think this proposal is definitely a step in the right direction. ROSCO (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ML Cad and AMD
|
|
(...) I do it *all* the time. Kevin (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Masks
|
|
(...) Do you mind if they're destroyed? It's easier to measure them if you don't care about having the piece be intact afterwards. Alas, I still don't know how to code in .dat - only in .dwg/.stl/.3ds. If you could find someone to clean up the parts (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows XP?
|
|
(...) ALL LDraw applications work in Windows XP that I am aware of. There was been NO report of any application NOT working. -AHui LDarw Help Desk (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Windows XP?
|
|
Hi all, I was just wondering if there's a comprehensive list of which Ldraw tools are compatible with Windows XP? As Micro$oft has now announced that 98 will no longer be officially supported I'm looking to upgrade.... ROSCO (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Resolution
|
|
(...) For general features, the standard rule of thumb is to model details which are 1LDU or larger. To cleanly model some features, you certainly can run into decimal places -- I typically go to 2 or 3 decimal places in part files. Any use of the (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Masks
|
|
(...) AFAIK, no one has done them yet. It would be nice if someone could volunteer. They're rather complex parts to make, though. (I'm not a parts author myself) -Tim (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Masks
|
|
(...) I've been wondering that myself. I have many to offer to mail to people if they need/want them (for CAD work.) -Dan (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) Dan, there seems to be some confusion here on your part. Hopefully other posters have cleared it up for you, but I want to go on record here on what the vision was. If it wasn't clear from the proposal, that's at least partly my fault since I (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) Sorry, I should have said, "how LDraw.org should function as an organization in the future." -Tim (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
