 | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) That was the intent of the minimum requirements. I'd like this to be as open as possible too, without risking the integrity and competency of the decision making body by allowing someone to walk in off the street and get in. (...) Yep. I'm (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 8461 Williams F1 Team Racer Ldraw File
|
|
Hello All, I've just posted the .MPD file for set 8461 Williams F1 Team Racer on my website. (URL) did not and will not model the stickers, otherwise it's the complete model. Next up on the list: 8458 Truck varient 8480 Space Shuttle (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets, lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Use of arbitrary elements with LSynth
|
|
(...) Except for time/skill/interest. (mostly time) (...) I'm thinking that just allowing for a level of indirection might do the trick. If you added a way to just specify what part you wanted used for the stringing together, and allowed it to be (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) I agree that the slots should be open to everyone but I'd like to weed out those who are the "rainy day" LDrawers. In other words, you need to have proven your competency and commitment. We could go on and on about what qualification someone (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) Right. The proposal is set up in such a way to encourage everyone - programmer or not - to discuss the issues publicly. When it comes to making decisions, a limited group of qualified people (in this case, programmers, parts authors, or (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) I agree, 100%. I think we should have more representation from the programming side of the community. :) Dan (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
I'm going to snip out the stuff I'm not going to comment on (...) I like this distiction. Now we can concentrate on forging a new path without having to worry about legacy DOS programs (...) I like this idea of having qualified members. You are (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Temporary URL for LDraw.org
|
|
Update: The nameservers for LDraw.org have been switched to point to the Peeron site in the mean time. In 36 hours or less, you should be able to access the site at www.ldraw.org again. The site on Peeron is not fully functional, the Parts Tracker (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Preview of multi-level callouts complete with pointers
|
|
(...) I was thinking more about this (and I've asked Miguel to help me with the resolution independent architecture of the new LPub features), and there are two *different* issues here. Issue 1: I want to render everything in low resolution (to save (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Use of arbitrary elements with LSynth
|
|
(...) Absolutely! Good point! (...) Kevin (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
