 | | Re: LDRAW Viewer 0.4 problem and more
|
|
(...) Actually I never reported this bug, only just experienced it too. Keep poking... On other news my Cocoa version is now displaying models on the screen - I spent 4 days with frustrating crashes. Are there any more issues with verision 0.4 that (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Any part udate? - Available !
|
|
For those not on LeoCad mailing list: Parts update is available. Thanks Leonardo ! Philo www.philohome.com Original announcement: ---...--- Last weekend I uploaded a new library for LeoCAD with more than 200 new pieces and I also updated LeoCAD (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Help! Need part badly!
|
|
All, I am in desperate need of a particular part! I'm not sure if it has been created or not. Some pics: (URL) part is basically a small Technic steering wheel. The part was in the 10016 LD Tanker train car, and as you can see from the Peeron (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Glut fixes and Offscreen Rendering
|
|
(...) OK... this is why I am confused about the new feature... doesn't it already exist in LDGLite? I ran the command line above with LDGLiteOSX 0.9.5f (I think it is 0.9.5f, anyway the get info says created Jun 22, 2002) and the "bitmap" folder (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | New MPD: Gyroscopic Fighter
|
|
I just finished LDrawing my Gyroscopic Fighter. Get the MPD file here: (URL) Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu www.bldesign.org (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Lpub 2.1.0.4 problems
|
|
(...) Not using POV 3.5. If I do something (combination I'm not sure) it shows up after I jump around the menus for a while. (...) Only running one instance for sure. I actually restarted and went straight to Lpub. I did try rendering one of the (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
|
|
(...) I'd have to look at the code again, but there's no reason why it couldn't deal with anything :) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about the Future of LDraw CAD family.
|
|
Hi Dwayne - (...) No reason that I see, in fact, it just hasn't happened yet :-) (...) Yup. (...) Absolutely. (...) It's funny how with this post you've hit the nail on the head with my current line of thinking. :-) Steve and I have been talking (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about the Future of LDraw CAD family.
|
|
(...) Ok, got an even more general question. Any reason that a group, could be set aside to develop just the CAD engine, and allow it to be used for loads of things? I mean, the core engine programmers could develop the core parts of the program, (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
|
|
(...) HTML can handle anything. So can HTTP, but of the characters listed above, I think it is only '-' and '_' which don't need special treatment. The next level of problems is that the parts tracker is implemented in Perl and running on a Unix (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
