 | | Re: New primitive box3-2.dat (was Re: What's up with box3#8.dat?)
|
|
(...) I'll have patience. These dull and rainy holidays in the Netherlands are ideal to do some part authoring ;-) Yes I have families to consider, too. My grandparents celebrated their 84th and 85th birthdays. And I could borrow some old parts my (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Large red train wheels
|
|
Thanks for the information. In general when a part seems to be just a scaled version of another, is a new part made or is the existing one just included by a new dat file and scaled appropriately? Thanks! Karl (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New primitive box3-2.dat (was Re: What's up with box3#8.dat?)
|
|
Chris, I'm alright with the 'u' convention. It'd be wicked cool if someone sat down and figured out all the possible box configurations (there can't be *that* many of them), so we could have a clearer idea of what we're trying to describe. Then (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Large red train wheels
|
|
(...) I don't think that part has been modeled yet. :\ Steve (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheel axles
|
|
(...) It looks like 35b has lines drawn where notches might belong. I don't have this part, so I don't know what it is *supposed* to look like. 35b does not fit current conventions, but I'm willing to ignore that, since it's an existing part. More (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
