 | | Re: Large LDraw/MPD Files?
|
|
(...) One of the first things I will probably try to do with LDView after I finally get 2.0 out the door is to work on its memory consumption. But first I have to figure out where all the memory is getting used. Doing some quick calculations based (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Guess what this is....
|
|
(...) Right, now we know what it is, I can show you some progress on my next project: the storage box! A picture can be found on the address mentioned above. Niels (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
|
|
(...) It would have been a nice character, but = is not allowed under MS-DOS The range of special characters possible with MS-DOS are: ! @ # $ % ^ & ( ) - _ { } : ' Which of these are HTLM friendly also ? With friendly greetings, M. Moolhuysen. (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Large LDraw/MPD Files?
|
|
(...) It will take a long time to load and if you attempt to scroll the model in the windows it will take long to do that to. (...) Nobody knows as no one has every put MLCAD thru that test. Either in FILE SIZE or insize of parts in the model. I'm (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Large LDraw/MPD Files?
|
|
(...) I've got 512MB of RAM and when I run MLCad with some of my big files I make sure that NOTHING else (including background apps) are running. -AHui (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Bad links to homepage.mac.com
|
|
FYI: there is a 10.2.3 update. OpenGL is updated to 1.4 in this release. Has anyone else updated and tried LdGLite? I haven't installed it and don't plan to until next week (by then www.macfixit.com should have a good list of problems associated (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
|
|
(...) Yes - I think the original intent of # was 'in two parallel groups'. How about '='? That will work in a URL. It is almost like two '-'s. Chris (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | New Part: 3622p03.dat - Brick 1 x 3 with Radio Pattern [DAT]
|
|
I will not attempt to officialize this part, since I don't even own it. Dat file is made from a picture on Peeron.com. /Tore 0 Brick 1 x 3 with Radio Pattern 0 Name: 3622p03.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Part 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 1 16 10 4 0 1 (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
|
|
(...) You R-ed C, Chris. Althought is't more correct to say that the missing edges are not *all* adjacent. But I'm a bit afraid that the dash and underscore charcters are to similar and could easely lead to confusion. Are there any other acceptable (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
|
|
(...) Manfred Moolhuysen developed this naming convention and posted (probably to the old lcad list) in May 1998, but I cannot locate a copy right now. IIRC the # was intended to indicate that the missing edges were not adjacent (which is what the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
