To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / *27465 (-10)
  Re: Is it important the difference of these parts?
 
(...) To me personally it is not important at all. But the LCAD community is large, we use the parts librry in different ways, and I rest assured that for some people there is a good reason. /Tore (22 years ago, 23-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: BFC Utility Inconsistencies
 
I personally edited 3001.dat to be BFC compliant. I'd be interested if it's not done correctly. If you have a Parts libray as of at least this past spring, I would think you'd have the 3001.dat that I 'fixed'... Well I think it got approved around (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: BFC Utility Inconsistencies
 
Well, a lot of them. 3001.dat, box.dat ... They show invisible faces in BFCTool. Well, it's been a while since I've installed the original parts library that came with LDraw. Maybe some of the files have changed since then. I'll try that. Thanks, (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  BFC Ceritfied Parts Question
 
I've notice a few parts on the Parts Tracker that are BFC certified, but some of their component primitives are not. Can justifiably I certify these parts? If I can, why? What if the part is BFC certified and then later on the primitive is BFC (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: BFC Utility Inconsistencies
 
Do you have any particular parts that demonstrate the inconsistencies you are seeing? -Kyle (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Is it important the difference of these parts?
 
Is it important the difference of these parts? 4085a.dat 4085b.dat 4085c.dat I know they are differente but i never worryed about it but now I'm not sure witch one to use "currently i'm building model LL6257" witch one is the latest version? (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Off-topic.clones: I wish TLG would have made this part!
 
(...) I'm wondering why this leaked over into .trains... I would say that if there are only 2 bins, "official LEGO(r) parts", and "everything else" these parts belong in the "everything else" bin. But the better solution is a different bin (library) (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Problem with LDraw-Mode and LDDP Bezier Curve plugin
 
(...) I don't believe you! (...) Ok, fair enough. I've added the feature to add the "control lines". Put (setq ldraw-bezier-draw-control-lines t) in your .emacs file, and download the latest source from (URL) test it. Fredrik (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  How do u make an animation of a minfig walking?
 
I can't seem to do a minifig animation walking with MLCAD "ldraw" or ldraw then convet it to pov-ray with l3p but I did an animation long ago using another way it was with Anton Raves's LEGO POV-RAY lib but is with hard to do that way since all is (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad)
 
  BFC Utility Inconsistencies
 
Using Thomas Foote's BFCTool and L3Lab I get different results in regards to BFC. Can anyone explain this to me? (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR