| | Re: Question about BFC [DAT]
|
|
(...) Oooh! Lemmee answer! Steve B was kind enough to help me out on pretty much this exact question a few days ago. If you use the statement: 0 BFC INVERTNEXT 1 16 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 -24 0 0 0 20 box5.dat 0 the box will be visible from within, but not (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Question about BFC
|
|
Dear All, Before I sent my first part to you ((URL) I tried to verify its conformity with BFC. During this investigation I found out that sub-part s\3069bs01.dat, which I used in my patterned part, is actually not BFC compliant. Main problem I think (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | New part: 3069pa1.dat - Tile 1 x 2 with Number-plate Pattern HC514 [DAT]
|
|
Hello, This is my first part I send to you. I'll put it to Parts Tracker as soon as I get an authorization from Steven. Marek Idec 0 Tile 1 x 2 with Number-plate Pattern 0 Name: 3069pa1.dat 0 Author: Marek Idec <mmidec@poczta.onet.pl> 0 Unofficial (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Patterned Parts Summary available in the Parts Tracker
|
|
To aid the review and allocation of pattern codes to the patterned (aka decorated) parts, a new Pattern Parts Summary has been added to the PT Reference (URL) Enter a part number in the "Patterned Part Summary" box to get a single page summary of (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Precision in .DAT files
|
|
(...) For parts, three decimal places is generally considered acceptable. Primitives are usually coded with four decimal places of precision, so that they can be scaled-up by a factor of 10 without degrading the precision below three decimal places. (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad)
|