 | | Re: DuploCAD! PrimoCAD!
|
|
(...) Um, yeah... I think I lost the... uh... (...) You, sir, should stop now. (...) The real ones say DUPLO, though older ones say LEGO. The LDraw ones say "LDRAW", and I believe that's for copyright reasons. -- Tony Hafner www.hafhead.com (23 years ago, 20-Apr-02, to lugnet.duplo, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DuploCAD! PrimoCAD!
|
|
(...) an Ldraw Lady Blacktron? For shame, Hafhead...! Looks great to me, although it is also true that I have zero real world Duplo to compare to. I especially like the trans colors. The trans colors are so candy-like it makes me want to reach right (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.duplo, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why Type 5 Lines?
|
|
(...) Sorry, I never intended to imply that it should replace type 5 lines. In addition to the problem of backwards compatibility, this will only work for BFC-certified parts. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Alternate Type 5 line algorithm and other BFC questions...
|
|
(...) Just check to see if the determinant of the matrix is negative. If it is, the matrix involves mirroring. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | DuploCAD! PrimoCAD!
|
|
Here's a small scene, a sample of things to come: (URL) The last image is done with trans-colors. No, those parts don't exist in those colors. I was just trying to show the internals of the parts better. Next priority: Eggs! -- Tony Hafner (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.duplo, lugnet.cad) !!
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Wrapping up 2002-02
|
|
Steve, I've posted several comments on KEYWORDS (and an occasional CMDLINE) meta-statements for various certified parts in the Tracker... Thanks, Franklin (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | [Tracker] Activity page not updating...
|
|
Steve, I posted a review on a part ("(URL) but that review is not showing up in the Activity page ("(URL) even though I've hit "Reload" several times. What's wrong?... Thanks, Franklin (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Why Type 5 Lines?
|
|
(...) Thanks for that explanation, however I think we still need to include type 5 lines in parts, so that programs which don't implement this technique (eg ldraw) can still display the curved edges correctly. Programs which do implement it can (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Wrapping up 2002-02
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes: [a whole lot of info, which I've snipped...] Steve, I wouldn't mind renumbering the as-yet-unofficial torso patterns you mentioned. I do see a potential problem, however... There are just *so* *many* (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Alternate Type 5 line algorithm and other BFC questions...
|
|
[snip] > > Normally you don't bother to enable Z buffer writing when drawing the > transparent surfaces, because they are the last thing drawn, and it won't > matter. However, it doesn't hurt anything to enable it, other than slowing > it down a (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
