 | | Another Bug...
|
|
Well, after finally getting Ldraw and MLCad to my other (non-internet) computor, MlCad decides to crash. It asks me if I want to register the file types. Then, when you click yes OR no, it crashes (illegal opperation) and whenever I try to open it, (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: memory for LGEO
|
|
(...) (URL) is an example of a scene that used LGEo parts and has other stuff in it. You can make it more complex by adding 'better' terrain using FORESETR or TERRAGEN to it. This one took 4 minutes to render. POV has has problem when it must figure (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: memory for LGEO
|
|
(...) I would like to see a scene that matched the complexity of the LGEO library pieces. (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't the technic gear teeth primitives?
|
|
(...) If they were designed properly, the tooth profiles will be different between the 8t, 24t, etc. gears. The tooth profile of a gear follows an involute curve, which means the profile is the involute of a base circle slightly smaller than the (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | missing two dat files - stu24b.dat and stu22c.dat
|
|
Please Help! If someone could email me or post them here, I'd be very thankful. Don't know what happened to them, and I dont want to redownload every parts update just to get 2 dat files. Thanks in advance. (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't the technic gear teeth primitives?
|
|
(...) editing (...) The teeth on the small 8 tooth gear are slightly different from the larger ones(Though in the file they are pretty much drawn as trapezoidal boxes). But on the two beveled gears they apear practicly identical as far as I can (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Optimising piece use (Was: LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM voting for March is open)
|
|
Cool. I like the parallel-paths-to-ground idea that you'd get with conductance and studs as resistors. I can see large 1x16 "ground plane beams being used, likewise maybe wall pieces. Another interesting aspect is surface gradients, and the use of (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Two questions on primitives
|
|
(...) I'm concerned that if we release those primitives that can be used as both inside and outside surfaces as BFC complient, we'll have to go back to all the other pieces that use them to insert the INVERTNEXT directive (where appropriate). (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: memory for LGEO
|
|
(...) I would like to point out a difference in thinking here. 64MB may be fast and good enough for rendering any complex/big model ALONE. That being just the model with a simple grey floor or the building instructions. Since I usely render my (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Non-coplanar vertices
|
|
Did we decide whether these are serious enough to stop certification? Part 2039s02.dat gets a bunch of these. ROSCO (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
