 | | Re: Why aren't the technic gear teeth primitives?
|
|
(...) Are the teeth the same between different parts? If they are different, it doesn't make much sense to have primitives for each one. Even if the teeth are different, it would be possible to make subfiles for the teeth. This could make sense for (...) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling for Beta Testers
|
|
(...) One poisiton left (...) One position left I need 5 more beta tester... please help out. AHui (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: memory for LGEO
|
|
(...) There isn't one. In practice, the more avaliabel memory that POV-Ray can use the less time it takes for POV to render. The speed of the CPU *doesn't* matter as much as the memory. I've tested POV on a dual-P3-650Mhz (256MB RAM) machine and a) (...) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | memory for LGEO
|
|
What is the minimum memory a computer needs to render a POV-file with LGEO-parts? 128Mb? 256? more? I know it depends on the size of the file, but is there a sort of guide for it? I need to know for the REND101 manual. Jeroen (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDR file Version and L3P Add On
|
|
"Scott E. Sanburn" <ls_ses@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Gtp6zw.Lp0@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) the (...) your (...) OK, done. That's my job, and I've been a bit busy recently so I've not had much chance to keep up on all the new software and (...) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
