 | | Re: video card
|
|
(...) You could also try adding this: if ((!strcmp(verstr, "1.1 APPLE-1.1")) && (!strcmp(vendstr, "Apple")) && (!strcmp(rendstr, "Generic")) ) { printf("Stencil buffer disabled for XOR with Apple driver.\n"); // Generic Apple driver has problem with (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: elimination of theme categories - is it time?
|
|
(...) Everyone knows the "Space laser gun" is actually a TV camera. Who would place a "Space laser gun" in official set 6659 ?? Space usage is just a space TV camera. Damien (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
(...) Really great! I try it right now! May be authoring/reviewing/correcting Ldraw parts will be easier. Damien (URL) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
(...) Cool now I don't need M$ Notepad for viewing the line of my ldr and mpd files. (...) That's the first thing I'm going to do before going to bed. (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
(...) leave work early so I can run home to mess around with it. And when I went to your site, I found out about your BMP-2-LDraw32 converter--also awesome! From now on I demand that you make more noise when you release something so I can find out (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
Hello Tore, (...) Open, (...) it (...) Hmm. not here. Even after a restart it stays in that dir ( you have to have already opened a file from there). (...) colour (...) Ok.. I will change that. (...) I did that. ;.) Can you send me an example file (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | elimination of theme categories - is it time?
|
|
A while ago, I posted a couple of messages: - "elimination of theme categories - Castle" ("(URL) - "elimination of theme categories - Space (pt. 1)" ("(URL) end result was, we wanted to wait until the new parts tracker was implemented. Well, the new (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
(...) How about a user defined button or two? I did the same thing with ldglite.exe, but then I wanted to add a few commandline args and stick it into a batch file, but calling it LDView.bat didn't fool LDDesignPad. Just imagine allowing the user to (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
(...) Yes, as long as you run the program. But when I've restarted program, it's back to My Documents. About the inlining function: The colour 16 should be replaced by the colour code of the original line. Also, there is something wrong with the (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Will LMPL be Simulation-approach or Usage-approach ?
|
|
Hi Láng Attila D. Hi Kiss Attila Csongor, Do not forget to download Spiderbot.dat (in lugnet.cad.models) The debate becomes VERY interesting. We embody two different well-known approaches. First : the Simulation approach. Things are nothing but (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
Hello Tore, (...) Thank you very much! (...) Ok.. Next version there will be a button for this. ;) (...) browsed (...) It always is using the directory where you last opened a file. At least it does it here.. i will check on it. (...) you (...) I (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Datsville: Authors unknown
|
|
Thanks, John! Long time, no seeing. /Tore (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
Hello Carsten, In deed a great program! Hassle-free installation, opens as fast as NotePad, drag-n-drop files into workspace. I miss an L3Lab button, but since I don't use LDView, I renamed a copy of L3Lab.exe to LDView.exe and thus fooled (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Spiderbot and current state of my ALM (stage 3) project [DAT]
|
|
Here is the Spiderbot DAT file with groups and rotation points, as saved by MLCad. The actual temporary draft for ALM (stage 3) is in my previous post. Damien 0 Spiderbot: My first ALM specification 0 Author: damien.guichard@wanadoo.fr 0 ROTATION (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Re[2]: I have read the article about LCD
|
|
(...) Hello Láng Attila D. Hello Kiss Attila Csongor, Now you speak about layers. That is precisely what I called "multiple syntax levels". Software layers are known to be very bad for software engineering and design in general. On the contrary, ALM (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re: More on Stickers (was: Questions on Stickers and Certification)
|
|
(...) Now that I look through my folder of parts, I'm thinking that maybe I was mistaken on this. Although a part that *I* have may use a sticker, that doesn't mean that the same part didn't also come printed. A long time ago, I noticed this part: (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | No shadow in LDLite 2.3?
|
|
Hi all, My LDLite 2.3 is not rendering any shadows anymore although "shading" is on!? Does anyone else has this problem? How can I resolve it? Greetingz... Sjaacko (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: My transparency colors are all BLACK now
|
|
Try going to Settings->General->Change and look at the shading optimizations. If it is set to maximum, change it. I've had the same problem before. (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
(...) It sound like a pile of features for a basic editor. Almost too good to be true. I hope I can find some time to try it out. -Chuck (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re[2]: I have read the article about LCD
|
|
Hi all, hello Damien! DG> This thread is not very frequented now. DG> May be because the debate has to become much more technical. Yes, there is not so many traffic here nowadays. We knew this will be a long project because it's a big project with (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
