 | | Re: How do we handle stickers in Ldraw?
|
|
(...) You are right, this was a suggestion that time too. The thickness of the flat box was then 1 LDU. What do you think is this enough? (...) Ampi ---...--- Imre Papp Geometria GIS Systems House email: ipapp@geometria.hu web: www.geometria.hu (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: How do we handle stickers in Ldraw?
|
|
(...) I don't agree with this statement, at least not right now. Stickers _do_ have some height, and I think it would be most correct to model this in LDraw. This would also fix the bleed-through problems. A sticker could be modeled as a very thin, (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | How do we handle stickers in Ldraw?
|
|
Dear List, I remember that some times ago we have discussed the topic of Lego stickers in Ldraw. There was no clear agreement on the nomenclature, the positioning, assigment to parts etc. I'm writing this mail to unfreeze slightly this topic, (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | DAT for 8466's "wheel holder", part# unknown
|
|
Has anyone created a DAT for the ball joint steering and suspension assembly that is found in the 8466 set? Here is a scan of the part I'm talking about: (URL) (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | ML vs LEO: how elements are shown in edit mode
|
|
It just hit me. Until just now I couldn't figure out why I couldn't get use to using MLCad, having started with LeoCad. It has to do with what elements are being shown on the screen. LeoCad shows: all the elements up to the current step MLCad shows: (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
