|
|
 | | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
| (...) Admittedly, it's a bit early in the morning over here, but I can't understand wether you mean that you want the parts to be categorized after the the type of part, or in what kind of set it appears the first time! *boggle* What about the (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | My first MOC in 3D
|
| Well, I decided to test the waters in the LDRAW and related software community finally. I've created a 3D model of my latest MOC Train Car as an initial test. I'll try to find a picture to scan of the actual model. I don't have a digital camera yet, (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment)
| | | | | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
| [Apologies for replying to my own post...] (...) A quick check of peeron reveals that set 4215, from 1998, did contain the camel head and the subject element (albeit in blue), and that was the same year as the release of 8462 (also having it in (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
| (...) I like it too, though I think "Towball socket" is a too-long way to say "ball socket". (...) How to determine if it's TRULY a Technic item though? Personally (and I'm apparently in the minority here), I want my part names to work for me (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: Horse parts in the parts tracker
|
| Sorry to reply to myself, I forgot a couple of things (or 1 thing, repeated a few times). For all of the decorated parts (listed below), you might add a new line to the header (between the 'unofficial element' line and the first command line) like: (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
