 | | Various Questions . . .
|
|
Okay I'm new to the whole LDraw thing so bear with me. I'm trying to model one of my creations and I've discovered two of the parts are not available. First of all, what is the process to get a part made? Can I produce a part myself and what (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
|
(...) In general, that's an interesting thought. But in this case, I don't think it's necessary - POV already has an include statement (IIRC). Of course, allowing the use of such a statement raises another issue: is it alright to distribute (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
|
(...) Just a thought. If the POVRAY (or whatever) sections get too big, would it make sense to add 0 INCLUDE meta-command so the LDRAW only programs don't waste time parsing? Then the POV specific versions could be distributed separately from the (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: l3lab
|
|
"Chris Daniel" <ldaniel2@prodigy.net> skrev i meddelandet news:GoHJ3t.832@lugnet.com... (...) .mpd (...) I've made an experimental program for this, saved at least one great model from .pov back to .dat (the .mpd packing will probably be lost). Feel (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
|
Dear All, Currently, there are a number of files on the Parts Tracker which include embedded POV-Ray, using the 0 L3P meta-statement. I've been emailing with Lars, Paul and Chris about some concerns I have with this approach. Basically, before we (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
