|
|
 | | Re: Proposal
|
| Sorry it took so long for me to get this back. I scoured my sources and all of the Internet databases I know of, and as far as I can tell, you are free and clear on all of these extensions: .ldr .ldl .lds .mpd .mlc I wonder if someone didn't do this (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: I've been published!
|
| (...) Sounds awesome! Will 2.1 autocrop the image to the rendered scene? The loss of this feature in LDLite 2.0 is the reason I still use v1.6... Steve (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: I've been published!
|
| Fredrik, I just ordered your book. Are there really a few part images produced with LDLite? That's so cool! :) The soon-to-be-released 2.1 version of LDLite now lets you set widths greater than 3, and draws both the type 1 and type 5 lines in the (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Shortcuts (was: Unofficial Update Progress)
|
| (...) Instead of the pattern file naming style, use the shortcut/composite part naming style - use a C instead of a P. Also, since the torso is the central part of the shortcut, use 973 as the base number. Likewise, use the pattern number as the (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Optional lines ... brain ache!
|
| Ignore me, I'm an idiot, I didn't notice the difference in the 2 pictures. It sort of makes sense now. Dan (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
