| | Re: Complete Figure Shortcuts for LegoCAD.
|
|
(...) (URL) (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: POV-Ray and lgeo missing filles
|
|
Scott wrote... (...) If you compare the 703 different references in L2P_ELMT.TAB with the 846 lg_xxx.inc files in the LGEO directory, you will see that lg_0090 Technic Universal Joint End lg_3473 ?? lg_4585 ?? lg_6229 ?? appear in L2P_ELMT.TAB, but (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
|
| | Re: Complete Figure Shortcuts for LegoCAD.
|
|
(...) I think so. I'll check for sure tonight. (...) Cool! (...) Steve (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: 6180 4 x 6 with studs on Edges
|
|
(...) Hmm. Try rerunning mklist.exe. In MLCAD, do a "scan parts". Other than that, I can't think of why the part isn't shown in the list. Steve (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Quesions about smoke
|
|
How do you make smoke in POVRAY? I need to make a scene with... you'll find out! Rick (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: Adding an image_map
|
|
Okay, I got it to work! I hadn't known that the picture was crammed into the 0,0/1,1 square. So the mass of gray pixels was in fact the picture, tiled beyond recognition. :) Thanks again, Coby! --Ryan (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
|
| | Re: Automatic Part Selection Query (Part 2)
|
|
(...) You can do that in a similar way already now: Select the parts by functionality (e.g. turning mechanism parts) and group them. Once you've grouped all parts, you can easely hide/unhide the groups as you like... Until now it's not possible to (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
|
| | Re: May I get train track dat file?
|
|
Zhengrong Zang wrote: What sort of track? 9V? 12V? duplo? (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Automatic Part Selection Query (Part 2)
|
|
Hi Micheal, I am wondering if it would be possible to use an unique identifier for each part belonging to a specific funcionality in the model. With this I mean: I would like to model for example the Technic Space Shuttle in MLCad and to see only (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
|
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) 1-n (...) present (...) we (...) of (...) not (...) In the main, I think they really are part numbers, considering the total number of parts there are very few exceptions, which I think can be explained by 1) some technical need for separate (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | May I get train track dat file?
|
|
(24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: 6180 4 x 6 with studs on Edges
|
|
I found it using add parts with 6180.dat, but I can't find it in plate list. Zhengrong (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Complete Figure Shortcuts for LegoCAD. [DAT]
|
|
(...) That does remind me of something. Did you receive the last 2 elements I sent Sunday? (4212A.dat and 2336p35.dat) James J. P.S.: Here is a preview of my work. P.P.S.: Future Editions may require my Solid Minifig Head prototype. ((URL) Minifig (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes: <snippage> (...) All along we have been using these numbers as 'part numbers', when actually they appear to be a mould number. What we are finding here is that there are 1-n mould numbers for each 'part shape'. (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) p/n (...) angle. (...) is (...) Good analysis, Steve - I agree wholeheartedly - Chris (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) Right. I'd rather have one file be a standard part file, and the other be a "shortcut" type file, meaning that the part name would be prepended with an underscore. I think we should *not* declare either the opaque or the transparent numbers to (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Adding an image_map
|
|
Hmmm, a mess of grey pixels isn't good, but at least something appeared on the object so that's a start. I think the next step would be to check the scaling and translation of the map. Here's a pertinent paragraph from the docs: // By default, the (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
|
| | Re: 6180 4 x 6 with studs on Edges
|
|
(...) 6180.dat was one of the original LDraw parts -- it should already be on your system. You can also grab a copy from (URL) (right-click the link and choose "Save Target As") Steve (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Adding an image_map
|
|
Thanks for the help, Coby! (...) I put this into the pov file and got something to appear on the object. But when I render it, all that you can see of the bitmap is a mess of gray pixels. Cheers, --Ryan (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
|
| | Re: Pod Racer
|
|
Fredrik: (...) That's what I call a pod racer! Beautiful work - also on the curved hoses. Play well, Jacob -- (URL) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|