 | | Re: Line Thickness
|
|
(...) I've implemented that already for the next version and during that I found out that there was a stupid bug in the code which caused lines to be disappearing. Now the drawing is much clearer, means lines are clearly visible. I also implemented (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Line Thickness
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Michael Lachmann writes (back in December): (...) Like Larry, I'm using MLCAD as part of producing printed instructions, and making the lines thicker would be very very helpful (in fact I can't use MLCAD to output the bitmap images at (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New "calculator" for parts authors. ( for windows 95+, nt?)
|
|
(...) Steve (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [Idea] New kind of tore for large diameter
|
|
(...) note: I've made toroidal bits before, using an approach similar to 2741c.dat, except I built 2741c.dat out of a 4-4cyli.dat and some 2-4cyls.dat. The reason we had the recent discussions about standardized torus p-files was so it would be easy (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Need part number for a dangerous predator
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Lee Gaiteri wrote: [earlier, John VanZwieten wrote:] (...) Remember, there's no such thing as a completely vertical line in 3D modeling. As soon as someone views the kitten from any viewpoint other than straight-on (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
