 | | Re: I'm getting leery (was Re: L3P Idea)
|
|
(...) I agree. POV commands are great for cleaning up the geometry. This was what I was really hoping for. However, if the command set is flexible enough for users to make their own custom parts for their private collections to do special effects (...) (24 years ago, 31-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Line Thickness and Antialiasing in LdGLite 0.7.3
|
|
(...) OK I confess, I took the cheap and easy fix rather than digging deeper to find the root of the problem. After further consideration I suppose the correct solution would be to run FixDatName() on all the hardcoded lowercase filenames when the (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line Thickness and Antialiasing in LdGLite 0.7.3
|
|
(...) Yeah, it's been that way for a while. Perhaps forever. I've fiddled with various ways to fix it, but haven't yet come up with anything that made me happy. You can see the remnants of one such attempt inside the #ifdef IGNORE_DIRTY sections of (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Guide to installing and using LDGLite on Linux
|
|
(...) Not right now. HTML is not my strong point. Just look at my lame excuse for a web page. Plus this would make mirroring the site twice as much work for me. However, I finally got motivated to figure out a way to update the main site at (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | I'm getting leery (was Re: L3P Idea)
|
|
(...) For what it's worth, I think I'd avoid taking L3P in this direction. I see L3P for what it is, a .DAT to .POV conversion tool, used for verts, lines, faces, etc. Before we start heading off into having .DAT versions of every possible .POV (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
