 | | LDLite Question
|
|
I think this is the correct group for this question, if not, please direct me appropriately. Can anyone help me understand the arguments to LDLite's "-A" switch. I want to view my model upside down, so essentially I want to rorate it 180 degrees (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
|
(...) As a somewhat innocent bystander, I'd like to see it stay LDraw.org, which is why I used the LDraw family of applications to refer to programs which will ultimately derrive from the work James started. (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: License - again
|
|
(...) Tim will have to correct us, but I believe that James's family has given Tim permission to continue publishing James's work. This is probably something which should be properly ironed out with the Jessiman's. They will have to decide to what (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
|
[snipped .cad.dev from ng list] (...) I very much agree with this. It doesn't matter if it's a physical split, or a simple matter of presentation. As long as normal people don't have to wade through the geek-gunk. (...) I want to do away with (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on new Parts Tracker
|
|
(...) Yes, the outstanding items will *definitely* be loaded into the system, one way or another. Steve (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
