 | | repost: chains1.dat [DAT]
|
|
With type 5 lines, not type 2. And Don, I didn't see any squirrelyness when I went over the part again. Could you be a bit more specific? 0 chain link 0 Name: chains1.dat 0 Author: Matt Schild 0 Unofficial Model 4 16 0 3 0 0 3.04 0.19 0.38 2.92 0 (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New part: Minifig torso with Han Solo pattern (no jacket) [DAT]
|
|
Here's the other Solo torso. After I fix the chain, the Lukes (all 3) will be next. 0 Minifig Torso with Han Solo Pattern (no jacket) 0 Name: 973p104.DAT 0 Author: Matt Schild 0 Unofficial part 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 0 0 1 "Custom" 0 ROTATION CONFIG 0 (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Searching for parts
|
|
Awhile back there was a thread about seams, subparts, and relations between them with respect to L3P and L3Lab. After a great deal of confusion on my part about what was causing the problem, I had an e-mail conversation with Lars Hassing which (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Correct attribution? (was Re: Parts tracker needs more visibility
|
|
(...) Yes. For starters, consider this. LDraw.org the organization belongs in with other organizations. LDraw the program ought to be parallel to MLCad and LEOCad and the other groups devoted to programs. ldraw/parts seems somehow wrong. Parts at (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another L3PAO update
|
|
(...) :-) Good idea (must be, you're not the first ;-) with .DATs for camera object types, please see "Re: Follow up to Camera Tricks" in lugnet.cad /Lars (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Subpart: chains1.dat: single link
|
|
(...) I did not know that. I'll post an update in a couple of days. (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Subpart: chains1.dat: single link
|
|
(...) Hmmm... I'll have to take a look. Thanks. (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another L3PAO update
|
|
(...) I was waiting for someone to push me to do that ;) Leave it to you to try and get me to be the best programmer I can be.. hehe (did you see my post about adding "camera" object types as .DATs and then having L3P use them for camera (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LGEO and L3P (Where is Lutz Uhlmann?)
|
|
More than a year ago Lutz Uhlmann agreed that L3P could reference his high quality LGEO pov parts. He promissed to send some info regarding the binary format of the element table files. However, I have not heard from him since despite several mails. (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: l3p question
|
|
Eduardo V asked: (...) Sorry, no. You'll have to e.g. "uncomment" sections (steps) directly in the POV file. /Lars (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: General question
|
|
(...) Yes, I put it into v1.2 20000616. I didn't mention it though, I was curious if anyone noticed :-) However, I'll change it back in v1.3 according to (URL) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Follow up to Camera Tricks [DAT]
|
|
Well, a number of times since L3P was announced back in August 1998 I have had discussions with several people about ways to control the camera. The basic idea of L3P was to automate the camera setting to what (I suppose) is the most common (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Follow up to Camera Tricks
|
|
(...) Well, I think of it the other way around! See (URL) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PAdd-On v1.2.5 is up (was: Bug in L3PAO...)
|
|
(...) I think I should stress that L3P looks in the current directory (where it is launched) and not where l3p.exe is. /Lars (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another L3PAO update
|
|
(...) Well, seems like an easy task for a program too! Backwards compatibility is very nice (knock knock :-) /Lars (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | St. Marks Cathedral .dat file [DAT]
|
|
Hi, I already posted this to lugnet.build, but some people requested the .dat file, so here it is. Here is a link to the pictures (generated with POV-RAY): (URL) need the latest parts update from www.ldraw.com. Note that the .dat file is just a (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: How do I speed things up ?
|
|
"Andy Lynch" <andy@andyandjackie.com> wrote in message news:004b01c0426c$20...lth.com... (...) pieces (...) minimize (...) the (...) Then (...) now (...) DAT (...) Thanks for this very good tip. -John Van (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: General question
|
|
"Joel Hoornbeek" <joel@webaccess.net> wrote in message news:G3Auqz.FMI@lugnet.com... (...) as (...) version (...) This really should be changed. I had a conversation with TLC's intellectual property attorney over this issue. She requested we NOT put (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: I finally used MLCAD!
|
|
(...) Yes! This bothers me (and confuses my sons) everytime we use MLCAD. I'm really sorry, Micheal, but I *don't* want MLCAD to be the default option for .DAT and .MPD files. (...) I agree, I like the way LEdit handles this. But it's not too hard (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Correct attribution? (was Re: Parts tracker needs more visibility
|
|
(...) Start by reorganizing the lugnet.cad.* newsgroups. I realize that's not going to happen, but that would be the best place to start. (...) It is icky that stuff is duplicated, but it's not really clear where *parts* *development* stuff should (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
